Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524
Original file (BC 2011 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03524 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Mentor, Minnesota to 
XXXXXXX, Texas. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He has been a Texas resident since his discharge from the Air 
Force and would like his HOR to reflect Texas. The fact that 
Texas is not reflected as his HOR is preventing his son from 
qualifying for education opportunities under the Hazlewood Act. 

 

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular 
Air Force on 29 Jul 1988. His DD Form 4, Enlistment -
Reenlistment Document, reflects Mentor, Minnesota as his HOR. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states that Joint Federal 
Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume I, Appendix A, states in part 
that a HOR is the place recorded as the individual’s home when 
commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a 
tour of active duty. Any correction must be fully justified and 
the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon 
entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the 
member's convenience. In accordance with AFI 36-2608, Military 
Personnel Records System, DD Form 4 is the source document for 
HOR. The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, 
Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering 
the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his 
military records as his HOR. 

 

The complete DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit 
C. 


 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 10 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 9 May 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-03524: 

 


 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Aug 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 28 Aug 2012, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Sep 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01382

    Original file (BC-2012-01382.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01382 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Florida to Minnesota. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03867

    Original file (BC 2012 03867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037

    Original file (BC-2012-04037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04350

    Original file (BC-2011-04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from New Jersey to Texas. DPSIPE states the member's initial DD Form 4 reflects Wrightstown, New Jersey as the city/state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout her military records as her HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02679

    Original file (BC-2012-02679.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02679 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Dayton, Ohio to Fremont, California. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01600

    Original file (BC-2012-01600.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Virginia to XXXXXXX, Texas. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04018

    Original file (BC-2012-04018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04018 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Dunkirk, Maryland (MD) to Eagle River, Alaska (AK). The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that his home of record was erroneously...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04662

    Original file (BC-2012-04662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Beaumont (Jefferson County), Texas (TX). His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects APO, AE 09036 (Wuerzberg, Germany) as his home of record at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00115

    Original file (BC 2013 00115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00115 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) and permanent mailing address be changed from Los Angeles, CA to Texas (TX). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report...